Wiretapping laws were created in order to protect the general public from arbitrary listening in by government and law enforcement officials. Besides criminals those employed in high level political positions or involved in legal proceedings with much at risk are more likely to be caught up in less official wiretapping activities.

This site is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary. The purpose of this site is to provide information from and about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government. Wiretapping Is a Threat to Small Businesses -- Here's How Jun 12, 2017 Annotation 5 - Fourth Amendment - FindLaw [Footnote 132] Among the dissenters were Justice Holmes, who characterized ''illegal'' wiretapping as ''dirty business,'' id. at 470, and Justice Brandeis, who contributed to his opinion the famous peroration about government as ''the potent, the omnipresent, teacher'' which ''breeds contempt for law'' among the people by its example. Id. at 485. The Government is Wiretapping You - 1498 Words | Bartleby Technological surveillance is used in a wide field of areas from wiretapping, hacking, bugging, electronic tracking, video surveillance and so on, but, “when used by the government, technological surveillance creates a particularly dramatic threat to the privacy of individual citizens” (p. 354), although this is uncertain to the government

Jul 11, 2009

That is very different from saying the law grants retroactive immunity to companies that cooperated with the government in the warrantless wiretapping, she said. The flaw in the government's logic on wiretapping - CNN Oct 29, 2012

Jul 13, 2015

Wiretapping equipment must be configured to exclude content and ISPs cannot be required to use equipment designed to allow surveillance. Law enforcement must report back to the judge data on how the wiretap was configured and used. Not permitted by government … Wiretapping Essay - 1150 Words Jul 25, 2012 EPIC - Wiretapping EPIC explained that Congress enacted strict and unambiguous privacy provisions in the Wiretap Act. "If the government wishes a different outcome," EPIC wrote, "then it should go to Congress to revise the statute." EPIC routinely participates as amicus curiae in privacy cases before the Supreme Court, most recently in Byrd v. Uruguay: Wiretapping Scandal Hangs Over Government | News